Roni,

 Thanks for reply.

Regards,
Vimal



-----Original Message-----
From: Even, Roni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:47 AM
To: Bhat Vimal-A21233; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] H263-2000 in offer and H263-1998
suported byremote.

Hi,
H263-1998 and H263-2000 use the same packetization. The difference will
be in the profile and level optional parameters that are only part of
h263-2000 or in the supported annexes as specified in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rfc2429-bis-08.txt .
So  to summarize terminal2 can accept the offer if the optional
parameters are compatible with what it supports. Example if the offer is
for H263-2000 with no profile (this is baseline) or if there are
compatibility in the set of supported annexes.
Note that H.263-2000 added the profiles specified in H.263 annex X which
a H.263-1998 terminal will not understand. Also there were annexes that
were added in the H.263 2000 version Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:sip-implementors-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bhat Vimal-A21233
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] H263-2000 in offer and H263-1998 suported 
> byremote.
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This  question is regarding  H263-2000 vs H263-1998.
> 
> Suppose Terminal1 supports H263-2000 and the Terminal2 supports 
> H263-1998.
> 
> When Terminal1 sends an offer with H263-2000 as codec type.
> 
> What shall be the behavior of Terminal2.
> 
> 1) Shall it accept  H263-2000  since it is backward compatible with 
> H263-1998?
> 2) or shall it reject H263-2000 codec because Terminal2 supports only 
> H263-1998?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Vimal
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to