Michael Procter wrote:
Dale R. Worley wrote:
Good catch! But as the characters are intended to be a magic
flag that (by chance) has never been used by an RFC 2543
implementation, and that
the characters are quoted in mixed case, I'm sure the
intention is that it is case-sensitive.
Actually, no. The intention is case-insensitive. The issue is
logged here:
http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=661
FWIW, I agree with Dale. I think the intent is case sensitive
for the very reasons that Dale mentioned.
Actually, I am not quite sure how to interpret the textual
description in the bugs database. I interpret it to mean
that what is called out in the spec is the need to ensure
that the branch id *following* the magic cookie be compared
case insensitive (which is fine by me).
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani [EMAIL PROTECTED],research.bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Inc.
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
