Voipers Portugal wrote:
> It should be the same UA otherwise you won't be able to bind the 5060 port
> to the other UA.

You seem to believe that a UA must be able to bind to a port. But the 
notion of a UA in 3261 is much more abstract than that. (See section 6 
definition.)

I usually think of a UA as being synonymous with a contact URI, used to 
REGISTER and/or in a dialog establishing request or response. (That 
isn't the full picture, because it doesn't cover requests that don't 
have contact addresses.)

IMO a phone that provides two "lines" by registering twice contains two UAs.

But it really isn't terribly important. What is important is that a 
single server can register multiple times and then determine which 
registration an incoming request is for.

It works for servers that don't register too. A good example that is 
widely deployed is a PSTN gateway.

        Paul

> Jose Simoes
> 
> On 4/25/06, Dale R. Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:20 -0400, Kedar Karmarkar wrote:
>>
>>>Is it possible to do?
>>>
>>>UA1 ---+
>>>UA2 ---+  ------ port 5000 <---- to network ------>
>>>UA3 ---+
>>>
>>>I am assuming they are three users?
>>
>>Yes, it is possible to separate INVITEs according to the user part of
>>the request-URIs, and route each INVITE to what is effectively a
>>different user agent.  Although in that case, people generally *call*
>>the whole system a single user agent.  But that does not make any
>>difference, really.  (Of course, if the user agent(s) register with a
>>registrar, each user name has to be registered individually.)
>>
>>Dale
>>
>>---
>>interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Sip-implementors mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to