Hi In this scenario is it possible that the INVITE is sent with same call id but different from tag and no to tag?
Regards Tauseef On 5/26/06, Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dale beat me to it with the answer. > > IMO, since sip stacks need to support at least a few cases of shared > dialog usage, they *ought* to be implemented for the general case of > arbitrary sharing of dialog usage. (Supporting the general case isn't > really harder than a special case.) But obviously not everyone agrees > with me, so you aren't very likely to find this supported. > > Paul > > Dale R. Worley wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 14:23 +0100, Munish Bansal wrote: > >> Hi All > >> > >> Is the following scenario possible? > >> > >> 1. Create a session using SUBSCRIBE. > >> 2. Send INVITE using the same Call-ID, from tag/To tag as is in > SUBSCRIBE > >> session. > > > > It might be theoretically possible. The current terminology would be > > "to create an INVITE dialog usage within a dialog that was created by a > > SUBSCRIBE". But I expect few or no UAs would handle it successfully. > > Generaly, INVITEs can only be used to create dialogs or to modify the > > media session within an INVITE-created dialog. > > > > Dale > > > > --- > > interop.pingtel.com -- the public SIP phone interoperability test server > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
