[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: "Peter Steiner" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > as newcomer to SIP, i am puzzled by the expected UA > behaviour in the case of a REFERence to a destination > that immediately diverts the INVITE request. > > e.g.: > > > X Y Z > > REFER ------------> > <------ 202 Accepted > INVITE ------------> > <---- 302 Moved temp > > ?? <-- --> ?? > > > how does Y proceed in the REFERence? > > If Y considers the 302 a final response to the INVITE (does not > recurse on it), then it considers that the INVITE has failed with a > 302 respose, and reports that to X in a NOTIFY. If Y recurses on the > 302, it sends > further INVITE(s), which are processed as you'd expect.
[sorry for the duplicated email] i see, so neither case requires special treatment. thanks for the quick response! regards, peter. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
