Comments inline...

Thanks & Regards,
Nataraju A.B.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:sip-implementors-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Byström
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] "override" expires in Inivte requests?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a question about the Expires header in an Invite. If a UA
receives an
> invite (in my particular case the UA is an IVR application) and the UA
wants
> to start sending and receiving voice without sending a 200 OK it can
do so
> by responding with say 180 or 183 that includes the SDP answer to the
offer
> in the Invite. Now if the incoming invite included an Expires header
with
> value 25, and the UA wants to keep the "early media" for a longer time
> (still with no 200 OK "answer"), is there something the UA can do? I
checked
> the RFC and to me it looks like the Expires is setting how long time
the
> offered session is available, and there has to be a final response
within
> that time. Maybe I did misunderstand the RFC or is there some other
way to
> only use provisional response? Any help is appreciated
> 

[ABN] I don’t know of any reference doc/section mentioning this one.. 
The following is my personal opinion about this topic. 

Once you get the response for any request you can update the life time
of the transaction by the expires header in the response. Similar logic
been used for SUB-NTFY mechanism (here it's been intended for dialog
life time than transaction) and been updated by 2xx for SUBSCRIBE
request. This is not exactly same as SUB-NTFY mechanism, but in the same
line we can extend Expires duration for INV transaction by the 1xx
responses. 

> Regards,
> // Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to