Rajnish Jain wrote: > The reason why the spec language discourages issuing 1XXs for > non-INVITEs and re-INVITEs is because that tends to open the can of > worms of the need/possibility of canceling a pending non-INVITE or a > re-INVITE. Canceling a non-INVITE or a re-INVITE will almost always > cause a race condition.
Although this may not be relevant to the original thread, FYI sending provisional responses for non-INVITE is mostly banned as per RFC 4320 and 4321. The reasons are explained there. cheers, -benny _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
