IMO this reflects a bias towards a "music on hold" form of hold. If the
UA that initiates hold does not want media to flow at all, then use of
"inactive" is a reasonable approach.
Paul
Alan Bergmin wrote:
> In RFC3264, what is the motivation for placing a stream "on hold" separately
> in each direction?
> Instead, why an agent could just not simply send an offer indicating that it
> wishes an "inactive" stream?
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
