On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 19:46 +0800, Agarwal Manish-A19715 wrote: > Hi, > User-Agent header has its own grammar. However this header does not have > much semantic significance other than display. May I know your views on > if User-Agent header value has some deviations (like a LWS is missing > etc ) from grammar. > Can the deviations be accepted? or we must strictly follow the grammar. > Any inputs on how other servers/clients handle this would be great.
"Be conservative in what you send, and liberal in what you accept" -- Scott Lawrence tel:+1.781.229.0533;ext=162 or sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sipXecs project coordinator - SIPfoundry http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipXecs CTO, Voice Solutions - Bluesocket Inc. http://www.bluesocket.com/ http://www.pingtel.com/ _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
