Isn't there another case where in-dialog request may be authenticated:
Sender of the request was authenticated during initial dialog setup and
the next in-dialog request has the Authorization header, but the nonce
has expired at the authenticating server/proxy and so it generates
another nonce and issues a challenge to the sender of that request?


Sanjay 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat)
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:11 AM
>To: Steve Langstaff
>Cc: SCG2; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Challenging a sendonly INVITE
>
>The question is a little too narrow. The same issues apply to 
>any in-dialog request.
>
>Steve makes a good point. But practically speaking 
>authentication is rarely done on in-dialog requests. Bypassing 
>it assumes that the dialog id is only known to the parties on 
>the signaling path, even though this might not be true.
>
>In most cases, in the original scenario here Phone A would not 
>share a secret with Phone B that could be used for 
>authentication. So if Phone A
>  issues a challenge there is a strong likelihood that it will fail. 
>This wouldn't necessarily cause the call to fail, but wouldn't help. 
>BUT, if Phone A *does* issue a challenge like this, then of 
>course Phone B should properly respond to it if it has the 
>proper credentials to do so.
>
>       Paul
>
>Steve Langstaff wrote:
>> How do you know it *really* is phone B that is asking for the HOLD? 
>> 
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>Behalf Of 
>>> SCG2
>>>
>>> Is there any circumstance at all where it makes sense to 
>challenge an 
>>> INVITE which is putting a call on hold?
>>>
>>> I can find nothing in 3264 that suggests it, but wondered if:
>>>
>>> Phone A -> Phone B (in doing so phone A may have been authenticated)
>>>
>>> Phone B later goes to put phone A on hold
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to