Because a brandname IP PBX that we are integrating our product (which involves flow based decisions, much like a port restricted cone NAT) with behaves this way. Could you please point me to the guideline in the SIP standards that suggests against this. Thanks and Regards, Amit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivar Lumi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Amit P. Ahuja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Determining UDP Connection to use for a SIP response
> > No for UDP protocol("udp") and same IP:port should be used, why ? > Most NATs are "port restricted cone" NAT, so they won't allow traffic in > from the end point to where you haven't send data. > > > 라스토기 wrote: >>> Considering the behavior of UAS-2, my question is: whether any SIP >>> standard suggests guidelines on whether it is advisable to send out >>> responses from a UDP port which is different from the one on which the >>> request was received? RFC 3261 - 18.2.2 Sending Responses only talks about >>> the destination the response needs to be sent to, however nothing about the >>> source. >>> >>> >> >> Response are sent with help of Via. So whatever Port is mentioned in Via, >> response will be sent to that from UAS-2. Looks like in your example Via >> contains 2000. In case of TCP/TLS, response are sent to same connection (if >> still there) from where REQUEST was received. Pls confirm.. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors