>> I think this should be treated as malformed header field for ACK request >> ( It is not expected to be included in ACK ) and thus should be ingored
I think the header is well formed (grammatically correct), but it has no semantics in ACK message. On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Pandurangan R S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think this should be treated as malformed header field for ACK > request > >> ( It is not expected to be included in ACK ) and thus should be ingored > > I think the header is well formed (grammatically correct), but it has no > sementics in ACK message. > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Singh, Indresh (NSN - US/Boca Raton) < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree with Robert w.r.t to best results for inter-operability, > > > > I think this should be treated as malformed header field for ACK request > > ( It is not expected to be included in ACK ) and thus should be ingored > > > > 8.2.2 Header Inspection > > > > If a UAS does not understand a header field in a request (that is, > > the header field is not defined in this specification or in any > > supported extension), the server MUST ignore that header field and > > continue processing the message. A UAS SHOULD ignore any malformed > > header fields that are not necessary for processing requests. > > > > Regards, > > > > Indresh > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > >>Behalf Of ext Robert Sparks > > >>Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:51 AM > > >>To: kavitha.subramaniam > > >>Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > >>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: Require: 100rel in ACK > > >> > > >>Without looking at the specs, here's what I believe they say (I'll > > >>chase down text later if you really need me to). > > >>In any case, this is what you should do for maximum interoperability: > > >> > > >>Don't put Require: 100rel in an ACK. > > >>Don't get upset if someone else does - ignore it. > > >> > > >>RjS > > >> > > >>On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:11 AM, kavitha.subramaniam wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> I have got a question about Require: 100rel in ACK Request. > > >>> > > >>> Presence of Require: 100rel header in ACK request is allowed? > > >>> > > >>> RFC 3262 says "A Require header with the value 100rel MUST NOT be > > >>> present in any requests excepting INVITE, although > > >>extensions to SIP > > >>> may allow its usage with other request methods". > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> In RFC 3261 it is mentioned that "An ACK request for a 2xx > > >>response > > >>> MUST contain only those Require and Proxy-Require values that were > > >>> present in the initial request". > > >>> > > >>> My question is: > > >>> Both the statements are contradicting. Which one should be taken? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Kavitha. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is > > >>intended > > >>> solely for the use of > > >>> the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain > > >>privileged or > > >>> confidential information and should not be > > >>> circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is > > >>> intended. If you have received this message in error, > > >>> please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the > > >>> intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly > > >>> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the > > >>contents > > >>> of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for > > >>> loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted > > >>> by this email including damage from virus." > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Sip-implementors mailing list > > >>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > >>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > >> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>Sip-implementors mailing list > > >>Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > >>https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
