Thanks for the response. Someone also pointed to 3261 which says this flow is invalid. 3264 doesn't speak about it clearly so wanted to get if its right or not
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 2:13 PM To: Manpreet Singh Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Offer/Answer question Your flow is not legal. See http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-0 7.txt Manpreet Singh wrote: > For an INVITE carrying an offer, does the offer/answer has to complete > within the INVITE transaction? Can it complete outside the transaction > but within the same dialog? Call flow is: > > -------------->Invite ( offer ) > <------------180 ( ringing ) > <------------200OK ( empty..no offer ) > ------------->ACK > <------------Re-Invite ( Answer to offer in first invite ) > -------------->200OK > <--------------ACK > > M > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
