See the following draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Szilagyi, Mike > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:41 PM > To: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Proper signaling of IPV4 / IPV6 in SDP? > > What is the proper way to signal RTP support for both > IPV6/IPV4 in the SDP? > > Should there be a single m=line with two c=lines: > > m=audio 25000 RTP/AVP 0 > c=IN IP6 2001:DB8::1 > c=IN IP4 192.0.2.1 > > or two m=lines with two 2 c=lines: > > > m=audio 25000 RTP/AVP 0 > > c=IN IP6 2001:DB8::1 > > m=audio 25000 RTP/AVP 0 > > c=IN IP4 192.0.2.1 > > Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors