What purpose would it serve to have a port? You can send the REGISTER request to an alternate port besides UDP 5060 without including that port in the domain part of the RURI.
Stephen Paterson wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it valid for a REGISTER request to contain a port parameter? > e.g. REGISTER sip:example.com:4060 > > I can't see anything in RFC 3261 that explicitly bans it. userinfo and @ > yes, but not port. I may be looking in the wrong place. > > It may be that it is implicitly banned by 10.2 but I'm not sure: > 'The Request-URI names the domain of the location service for which the > registration is meant.' > I guess the port would not be considered part of the domain. > > Cheers > > Steve > > > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 > 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) > P Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you > really need to > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599 _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
