El Martes, 25 de Noviembre de 2008, Victor Pascual Ávila escribió:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, whatever "cool" RFC's/draft's say, the fact is that most of SIP end
> > points (AKA "phones") use "From" header to render the CallerID to the
> > *human* and they ignore P-Asserted-Identity or deprecated
> > "Remote-Party-Id" headers.
>
> Using the From display name occurs frequently, but I wouldn't be quite
> so emphatic.
> https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary

Using the From Display Name as CallerID is dangerous IMHO.

Imagine a phone receives a call with From:

  From: "111111" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Also imagine that the phone renders "111111" as CallerID (so the human expects 
111111 is calling him). But the human can't answer now and decides to call 
later by pressing "Missed calls" in his phone menu over the received call.
The INVITE the phone will generate as this RURI:
  <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so the human is, in fact, calling to 222222 (while he expect being calling to 
number 111111).



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to