Harbhanu, I agree with you, addr-spec must be used as well for Refer-To. However, looks like RFC3515 does not state this explicitly.
Regards, -Rockson -----Original Message----- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of harbhanu Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:16 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] FW: Regarding Refer-To header Hi, For all the headers defined in 3261, which are obtained from ( name-addr / addr-spec ), we have a rules saying that the values must be wrapped with '<' and '>', incase addr-spec contains any of comma, semi-colon or question mark. For example, statement fro 'From' header field: "Even if the "display-name" is empty, the "name-addr" form MUST be used if the "addr-spec" contains a comma, question mark, or semicolon. Syntax issues are discussed in Section 7.3.1." So, does the value for "Refer-To" also follows same normative rule, as it's also obtained from name-addr / addr-spec ?? I couldn't find any normative statement in rfc-3515 for this. Thanks! Regards, Harbhanu _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
