Please, read my two mails at the beggining of this thread. AFAIK you are wrong. ---------- Original question is ....
"Hi all, Just a quick one to confirm something. Is it perfectly reasonable to have multiple concurrent transactions of the same method on a single dialog? I.e. can you send a second INFO (for example, could be any non-INVITE) before receipt of a response for a previous INFO on the same dialog? I'm talking about separate transactions, not retransmissions. I'm fairly sure you can, I just can't find any text to support it. Cheers Steve" ----------- UAC can send second INFO (with higher Cseq than previous INFO). I have no doubt. Please calrify why you said that I am wrong. -----Original Message----- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz Castillo Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:38 PM Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple concurrent transactions 2009/5/5 Rastogi, Vipul (Vipul) <vrast...@avaya.com>: > Cseq is for sequencing of Requests in existing dialog. So as along as new > transaction follows this, I don't see any issue in UAC. UAS may have policy > to limit number of outstanding transaction but that is out of SIP. Any > comment ? Please, read my two mails at the beggining of this thread. AFAIK you are wrong. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
