2009/7/16 Vikram Chhibber <vikram.chhib...@gmail.com>: > It does not make sense to transaction from active to pending. RFC 3857 > also does not show this transaction. > Why not move from active to terminated with reason "rejected"? Alice > UA can show Bob as offline always. Which IMO, is modest approach to > not let Alice know that Bob has rejected her. > The UA can also implement a separate list showing the authorization > policy set for buddies watching him. Thus, Bob in future can allow > Alice to share his presence and Alice need not add Bob again.
Thanks a lot. I will check RFC 3857 and tell it to the vendor. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
