Within your example, the INVITE with Authorization isn't being sent within dialog; thus section 12.2 does not apply.
> -----Original Message----- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Krishna Rao > Gurram > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:09 AM > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query about retrying requests with > Authorization!!!! > > Hi, > Our call scenario involves the following exchange: > INV-> > <- 401 > ACK -> > INV With Credentials in Authorization header -> > > Please let us know if in this scenario, > Is it correct to use the same Request URI from the initial INVITE to form > the INVITE with credentials? > (or) > Is it correct to form the INVITE with credentials by creating a Request > URI from the dialog state (as mentioned in Section 12.2 of RFC 3261)? If > this is the case, the To URI / top most element from the Record-Route > header in the 401 response will be used as the Request URI in the INVITE > with credentials. > > Thank You. > Krishna.. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
