HI

I am sure this has been asked many times but I could not find a
definitive thread on how to resolve this. Moreover RFC 3261 section 14.2
is vague about resolving race conditions for Re-INVITEs.  You could
directly skip over to offending section (in red) below for the issue in
question.

 

Here is the call flow

UA1                                       UA2

---INVITE (call leg#1)--- >

< -- 100 trying (call leg#1)--

< -- 180 ringing (call leg#1)--

< -- 200 OK (call leg#1)--

---ACK (call leg#1)--- >

<--- RTP established--- >

 

UA2 now initiates a new dialog with UA1 hybrid switch to call a 3rd
party to which the call should get bridged

UA1                                       UA2

< -- INVITE (call leg#2)--

---100 trying (call leg#2)--- >

---180 ringing (call leg#2)--- >

---200 OK (call leg#2)--- >

< -- ACK(call leg#2)--

 

UA2 now performs re-INVITE on call leg #1 and #2 to bridge RTP between
caller and transfer target on UA1 Switch.

UA1                                                       UA2

< -- INVITE w/o SDP (call leg#2)--

---100 trying (call leg#2)--- >

---200 OK w/ SDP (call leg#2)--- >

< -- INVITE  w/ SDP (call leg#1)--

---100 trying (call leg#1)--- >

---200 OK w/ SDP(call leg#1)--- >

< -- ACK w/ SDP(call leg#2)--

< -- ACK (call leg#1)--

 

Offending section

Now UA2 receives re-invite w/ SDP on call leg #1 from UA1. UA1 extracts
SDP from call leg #1 and sends a Re-INVITE to UA2 on call leg#2. At the
same time UA1 sends a re-invite on call leg#2 to UA2.  These are part of
session refresh being triggered  using re-invites.

UA1                                                       UA2       

 -- INVITE  w/ SDP (call leg#1)--- >

<-- INVITE  w/ SDP (call leg#2)--- 

-- INVITE  w/ SDP (call leg#2)--- >

<--491 request pending (call leg#2)---

 -- 100 trying(call leg#2)--- >

-- 491 request pending(call leg#2)--- >

-- ACK(call leg#2)--- >

<-- ACK (call leg #2)---

 

 

Question is -

When a re-invite and 491 pending cross over happens on a dialog (call
dialog #2), how do both the UA resolve this. What retry timers are used
to resolve this and is there a draft available that addresses this
issue?

 

Thanks in advance

Dushyant

 

 

 

 

 

 


                                        
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain 
confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its 
affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. Any 
liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on any 
information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy the original 
transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the contents to any other 
person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. 
Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or 
its affiliated entities.
                                        
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to