I don't know much about Comedia, but the sniffer uses the SDP to associate RTP packets with the call, so if the IP in the SDP is different from the IP of the RTP packets, they won't be associated and the PUBLISH wouldn't contain a quality report. That and the packet filter expects RTP over UDP.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/12/1 Terry Howe <[email protected]>: > > https://github.com/TerryHowe/SIP-Voice-Quality-Report-Reaper > > > > README: > > > > The SIP Voice Quality Report Reaper sniffs RTCP and RTP packets and > generates > > SIP PUBLISH messages with voice quality reports. It does this in > accordance > > with the following RFC: > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6035.txt > > > > The tool is designed to sniff packets on a network and generate voice > quality > > reports most likely to another network. The advantage of using the mode > where > > RTP packets are sniffed is most devices don't support voice quality > reports > > and the Reaper can be used to analyze a segment of the network so that > > fingers can be pointed. > > Hi, it looks very interesting. Let me a question: in case a server > uses Comedia (so the client SDP is not relevant and can contain a > private address), woudl be the report valid? > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
