On 03/08/2011 03:48 PM, Nitin Kapoor wrote: > Dear All, > > I have one call scenario where my termination is sending the SDP in 183 as > well as in 200 OK also. As far as i know if we are getting SDP in 183 > session progress then my UAC can ignore the SDP in 200 OK. Also most of the > time SDP is same. > > But here i noticed the slight difference of "Session Version". Here when my > termination is sending 188 Session Progress with SDP is sending the SDP as > below. > > I can see that my Termination is incrementing "*Session Version*" for SDP > in 183& 200 OK in same dialog.. > > *183 with SDP* > > S_OWNER : o=TLPMSXP2 22660 *22660* IN IP4 69.90.230.210 > S_NAME : s=sip call > S_CONNECT : c=IN IP4 69.90.230.217 > TIME : t=0 0 > M_NAME : m=audio 59072 RTP/AVP 18 4 8 98 > > 200 OK with SDP: > > S_OWNER : o=TLPMSXP2 22660 *22661* IN IP4 69.90.230.210 > S_NAME : s=sip call > S_CONNECT : c=IN IP4 69.90.230.217 > TIME : t=0 0 > > Could anyone please let me know if that is okay to increment the session > version and if any supported document is there?
Was the to-tag in the 183 and 200 responses the same or had it changed? -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kflem...@digium.com | SIP: kpflem...@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
