On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote:
> 2011/7/7 Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net>: > > 2011/7/7 Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net>: > >> 2011/7/7 Brez Borland <brez...@gmail.com>: > >>> I think transport/transaction layers should work to prevent cases like > this. > >>> Personally I would look to close the previous connection associated > with the > >>> transaction, and use the new connection for any further associated > >>> communications. > >> > >> It could be a good choice. > > > > Mmmm, danger, what about if the first connection is opened by a proxy > > which currently mantains more than one transaction with the server? > > why to close such connection just because a retransmission of some one > > of those transactions has arrived via other connection? > A very valid point. Server should not blindly close the previous connection. Mechanism should be in place to track the connection use, if other transactions use it, if it's still open, etc. Regards, _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
