> I have the following scenario: > > Incoming invite has Privacy:id along "From" header > carrying "Display Name" > > Where as the outgoing INVITE has "From" Header set > "sip:Anonymous@Anonymous.invalid" whereas the > display-name goes as it is. > > Is there any draft mentioning about this behavior > handling.
Based upon what was provided, I don't recall any RFC (such as rfc3323, rfc3325, or rfc5876) specifying that "id" would cause the specific behavior. However since your example reflected B2BUA involvement, there may be additional privacy/identity services (or expanded RFC interpretations of the "id" impacts) within the B2BUA triggering the specific behavior. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
