Assuming P1 and P2 are truly proxies, and not B2BUAs, then (1) is
correct and (2) is not. What do you find in 3261 that makes you think it
allows (2).
Thanks,
Paul
On 3/1/14 12:10 AM, Kiran Kumar wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a confusion in the following scenario.
> After establishing a connection between two peers in a SIP trapezoid which
> of the following sequence is correct while processing BYE where P1 and P2
> are statefull proxies.
>
> 1. UAC P1 P2 UAS
>
> BYE -> BYE -> BYE -> BYE
> 200 <- 200 <- 200 <- 200
>
> or
>
> 2. UAC P1 P2 UAS
>
> BYE -> BYE
> 200 <- 200
>
> BYE-> BYE
> 200 <- 200
>
> BYE -> BYE
> 200 <- 200
>
> RFC 3665 is showing scenario 1. but RFC 3261 does not explain anything
> about proxy processing of non-invite request but indirectly says 2 is also
> correct while explaining transaction in section 17.
>
> Thanks,
> Kiran.
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
