On 5/12/14 10:16 AM, Brett Tate wrote:
Hi,
I assume that Paul intended to indicate RFC6337.
Thanks Brett. Yes, 6337.
Thanks,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sander Rambags
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:54 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive
answer after sendonly
RFC6637 ??? I don't think that's the one you mean.
Rg Sander
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
