It's valid, but more than slightly silly. Why even send a PAID if it's not going to have valid information?
For PPID, it still would be valid, but pretty much guaranteed that it will be ignored. Joel Gerber Network Specialist Network Operations Eastlink E: joel.ger...@corp.eastlink.ca T: 519.786.1241 -----Original Message----- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: July-02-14 12:17 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Hi, May i know whether it is valid to add Anonymous URI ( anonymous@anonymous.invalid) in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header filed. Thanks Regards Rajesh _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
