Hi Vivek,

RFC 3264 says, if Re-INVITE fails (Ex : 4xx or 5xx any other error) UAC should 
switch back to the state which has before sending the Re-INVITE. 
Here Re-INVITE is not failing, it has 200 OK but no media. So UAC has no other 
option so terminating the call with BYE.

Regards
Srinivas

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu 
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vivek Batra
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:47 PM
To: Alok Tiwari
Cc: sip-implementors
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

Hi all,

Just thinking widely if it's violating the SDP offer/answer in ReINVITE, then 
why to terminate the complete dialog instead of clearing only specific 
transaction...

Best Regards,
Vivek Batra


On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alok Tiwari <alo...@globallogic.com> wrote:

> Hi Tarun,
>
> IMO, this behavior is correct as it violates the offer-answer model. 
> The answer must have overlapped SDP. But in mentioned scenario, the 
> media at UAC and UAS is not in sync and therefore UAC should terminate 
> the dialog in such scenario.
>
> Thanks,
> Alok Tiwari
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Tarun2 Gupta 
> <tarun2.gu...@aricent.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Our implementation is clearing the call on receiving no SDP (answer) 
> > in
> > 200 OK for a ReINVITE with SDP (offer) sent. Is this (call clearing) 
> > the recommended behavior?
> > I am not able to find any normative RFC references to support this. 
> > Can you please help here?
> >
> > Regards
> > Tarun Gupta
> >
> > "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended
> solely
> > for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may 
> > contain privileged or confidential information and should not be 
> > circulated or
> used
> > for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have 
> > received this message in error, please notify the originator 
> > immediately. If you
> are
> > not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly 
> > prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents 
> > of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or 
> > damage
> arising
> > from the use of the information transmitted by this email including
> damage
> > from virus."
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alok Tiwari | Consultant
> GlobalLogic
> P +91.120.406.2000 x 2477  M +91.991.034.7139 S alo...@globallogic.com 
> <http://alok.t_globallogic.com/> www.globallogic.com  
> <http://www.globallogic.com/> 
> http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>



--
Best Regards,
Vivek Batra
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to