I would take a look at the contact header in the INVITE and both PRACKs. Joel Gerber Network Operations Specialist - Telephone Telephone Eastlink joel.ger...@corp.eastlink.ca T: 519.786.1241
-----Original Message----- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Wiklund Sent: June-11-15 9:59 AM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] 183 with 100rel required, followed by 180 with 100rel supported Call flow - outgoing call from PBX to ITSP. --> INVITE with 100rel supported <-- 100 trying <-- 183 session progress with 100rel required --> PRACK <-- 200 OK on PRACK <-- 180 ringing with 100rel supported --> PRACK <-- 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist I've checked the To/From tags and the Call-Id, everything is identical. I'm assuming the PBX is doing the correct thing here, it receives a 180 ringing with 100rel supported. Or is there something in the standard saying that if you have PRACKed one provisional response there's no need to do it on subsequent provisional responses? Any idea what the culprit could be? I've opened a ticket with the team running the server that's sending the 481, but I just wanted to check with you guys if there's anything obvious here. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
