Hi Sourav,
 
The URI is not used for matching in 3261.   So, in order to have better 
interoperability, you should limit to matching the fields identified by 3261.

Thanks,
Neel.

12.2.1.1 Generating the Request

   A request within a dialog is constructed by using many of the
   components of the state stored as part of the dialog.

   The URI in the To field of the request MUST be set to the remote URI
   from the dialog state.  The tag in the To header field of the request
   MUST be set to the remote tag of the dialog ID.  The From URI of the
   request MUST be set to the local URI from the dialog state.  The tag
   in the From header field of the request MUST be set to the local tag
   of the dialog ID.  If the value of the remote or local tags is null,
   the tag parameter MUST be omitted from the To or From header fields,
   respectively.

      Usage of the URI from the To and From fields in the original
      request within subsequent requests is done for backwards
      compatibility with RFC 2543, which used the URI for dialog
      identification.  In this specification, only the tags are used for
      dialog identification.  It is expected that mandatory reflection
      of the original To and From URI in mid-dialog requests will be
      deprecated in a subsequent revision of this specification.

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu 
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sourav 
Dhar Chaudhuri
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:25 AM
To: Sip-implementors
Subject: [Sip-implementors] From Header value is getting changed from 100 
trying to 200OK

Hi,    I just need clarification is the below mentioned scenario will work 
properly
UAC1  sending INVITE request to UAS1
----------------------------------------------------------
From: "+351964901478" <tel:+351964901478>;tag=AUA401YVCeghCjaA

UAS1 is responding 100 Truing for that INVITE to UAC1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "+351964901478" <tel:+351964901478>;tag=AUA401YVCeghCjaA


UAS1 is then sending 200OK for that INVITE to UAC1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From:
 "+351964901478" <tel:1478>;tag=AUA401YVCeghCjaA


All other header are prefect.So is UAC1 send ACK for this? Or UAC1 ignore that 
200OK due to the change in From header value?


Thanks & Regards,Sourav







_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to