Hi Tarun,

Thanks for answer. Can you please advise of there is any document we have
Where i can do some study/research?

Regards
Nitin

On 00:05, Fri, Jul 31, 2015 Tarun2 Gupta <tarun2.gu...@aricent.com> wrote:

> Hi Nitin
>
> This is a perfectly legal scenario, the 2nd ReINVITE is essentially a Stop
> Fax / Revert to Audio ReINVITE.
>
> We have seen this behavior with many T.38 vendors.
>
> Regards
> Tarun Gupta
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:
> sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of NK
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 12:30 PM
> To: Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Reinvite after T38 Negotitaion
>
> Hi Puneet,
>
> Below is the SDP for Fax Re-invite from Vendor (UAS) after audio call
> established with initial offer.
>
> *T.38 RE INVITE SDP*
>
>
> v=0
> o=HuaweiSoftX3000 32970986 32970988 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 s=Sip Call c=IN IP4
> 1.1.1.1
> t=0 0
> m=image 41046 udptl t38
> a=T38FaxVersion:0
> a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
> a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
> a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy
> m=audio 41128 RTP/AVP 8 0 101
> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=ptime:20
> a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
> a=ecan:fb on -
> a=fax
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
>
>
> *200 OK SDP for T.38 Re invite*
>
>
> v=0
> o=Sonus_UAC 10922 10626 IN IP4 1.1.1.1
> s=-
> c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1
> t=0 0
> m=image 6334 udptl t38
> a=T38FaxVersion:0
> a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
> a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
> a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:262
> a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:90
> a=sendrecv
> m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 8 0 101
> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=sendrecv
> a=ptime:20
> a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
>
>
> *This is the Re-invite SDP after T38 Invite*
>
> v=0
> o=HuaweiSoftX3000 32970986 32970989 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 s=Sip Call c=IN IP4
> 1.1.1.1
> t=0 0
> m=audio 41046 RTP/AVP 18 101
> a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
> a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
>
> Regards,
> Nitin Kapoor
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Kumar, Puneet (Puneet) <pune...@avaya.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nitin,
> >
> > For reINVITE for fax, is far-end converting "m=audio" line to "m=image" ?
> >
> > Can you share the SDP in both reINVITE's.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Puneet
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:
> > sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of NK
> > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:32 AM
> > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP Reinvite after T38 Negotitaion
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > It is legal to send re-invite after sending T.38 when negotiation is
> > already done.
> >
> > Below is the scenario.
> >
> > UA ---------> INVITE
> > UA  <------100 Trying
> > UA <------- 180 w/SDP
> > UA <------- 200 OK
> > UA  ----------> (Re-invite for fax with T.38) UA <------100 Trying UA
> > <-----------200 OK *UA <---------- RE-INVITE wSDP G.729* *UA
> > ---------> 488*
> >
> > Now after this another re-invite is coming (in green) with G.729 Codec
> > and i am rejecting this with SIP 488.
> >
> > Anyone observed this kind of scenario earlier?
> >
> > Can you please advise and help on this.
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Regards
> > Nitin Kapoor
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cs.columbia
> > .edu_mailman_listinfo_sip-2Dimplementors&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZ
> > H64Q&r=MpUJwczUGVfrfzzrKZS6B5RFgsQraA_BMVc2YztX3Gk&m=A4aV5E2mvyj-yPDeU
> > yK6vrfY6BujtRe4gwymOROxduM&s=AgL6vuPFPgil3UGHFMxI_him1MuOJE24FIyl4ekme
> > y0&e=
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely
> for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain
> privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used
> for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
> prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of
> this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising
> from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage
> from virus."
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to