Hi Tarun, Thanks for answer. Can you please advise of there is any document we have Where i can do some study/research?
Regards Nitin On 00:05, Fri, Jul 31, 2015 Tarun2 Gupta <tarun2.gu...@aricent.com> wrote: > Hi Nitin > > This is a perfectly legal scenario, the 2nd ReINVITE is essentially a Stop > Fax / Revert to Audio ReINVITE. > > We have seen this behavior with many T.38 vendors. > > Regards > Tarun Gupta > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto: > sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of NK > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 12:30 PM > To: Kumar, Puneet (Puneet) > Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Reinvite after T38 Negotitaion > > Hi Puneet, > > Below is the SDP for Fax Re-invite from Vendor (UAS) after audio call > established with initial offer. > > *T.38 RE INVITE SDP* > > > v=0 > o=HuaweiSoftX3000 32970986 32970988 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 s=Sip Call c=IN IP4 > 1.1.1.1 > t=0 0 > m=image 41046 udptl t38 > a=T38FaxVersion:0 > a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 > a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF > a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy > m=audio 41128 RTP/AVP 8 0 101 > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=ptime:20 > a=silenceSupp:off - - - - > a=ecan:fb on - > a=fax > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > > > *200 OK SDP for T.38 Re invite* > > > v=0 > o=Sonus_UAC 10922 10626 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 > s=- > c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1 > t=0 0 > m=image 6334 udptl t38 > a=T38FaxVersion:0 > a=T38MaxBitRate:14400 > a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF > a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:262 > a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:90 > a=sendrecv > m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 8 0 101 > a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=sendrecv > a=ptime:20 > a=silenceSupp:off - - - - > > > *This is the Re-invite SDP after T38 Invite* > > v=0 > o=HuaweiSoftX3000 32970986 32970989 IN IP4 1.1.1.1 s=Sip Call c=IN IP4 > 1.1.1.1 > t=0 0 > m=audio 41046 RTP/AVP 18 101 > a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 > a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 > a=fmtp:101 0-15 > a=fmtp:18 annexb=no > > Regards, > Nitin Kapoor > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Kumar, Puneet (Puneet) <pune...@avaya.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi Nitin, > > > > For reINVITE for fax, is far-end converting "m=audio" line to "m=image" ? > > > > Can you share the SDP in both reINVITE's. > > > > Thanks, > > Puneet > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto: > > sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of NK > > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:32 AM > > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > Subject: [Sip-implementors] SIP Reinvite after T38 Negotitaion > > > > Dear All, > > > > It is legal to send re-invite after sending T.38 when negotiation is > > already done. > > > > Below is the scenario. > > > > UA ---------> INVITE > > UA <------100 Trying > > UA <------- 180 w/SDP > > UA <------- 200 OK > > UA ----------> (Re-invite for fax with T.38) UA <------100 Trying UA > > <-----------200 OK *UA <---------- RE-INVITE wSDP G.729* *UA > > ---------> 488* > > > > Now after this another re-invite is coming (in green) with G.729 Codec > > and i am rejecting this with SIP 488. > > > > Anyone observed this kind of scenario earlier? > > > > Can you please advise and help on this. > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Regards > > Nitin Kapoor > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cs.columbia > > .edu_mailman_listinfo_sip-2Dimplementors&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZ > > H64Q&r=MpUJwczUGVfrfzzrKZS6B5RFgsQraA_BMVc2YztX3Gk&m=A4aV5E2mvyj-yPDeU > > yK6vrfY6BujtRe4gwymOROxduM&s=AgL6vuPFPgil3UGHFMxI_him1MuOJE24FIyl4ekme > > y0&e= > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely > for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain > privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used > for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received > this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are > not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly > prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of > this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising > from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage > from virus." > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors