Noted with thanks.
-- *Moisés Amiga* *Voice Operations* *Mex T.* + 52 (55) 5147 8040 ext 1367 *Cel.* +521 55 2575 6848 Llámame <http://callmenow.c3ntro.com/c3ntro1...@c3ntro.bicentel.net> Paseo de las Palmas 215-304 Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, México D.F. 11000 El vie., 21 de dic. de 2018 a la(s) 13:35, Roman Shpount (ro...@telurix.com) escribió: > RFC 5057 is informational, not a standard. RFC 3261 specifies that > dialog established using an INVITE transaction can only be terminated using > a BYE message. > > Specifically in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-12.2.1.2: > > If the response for a request within a dialog is a 481 (Call/Transaction > Does Not Exist) or a 408 (Request Timeout), the UAC SHOULD terminate the > dialog. A UAC SHOULD also terminate a dialog if no response at all is > received for the request (the client transaction would inform the TU about > the timeout.) > > For INVITE initiated dialogs, terminating the dialog consists of > sending a BYE. > > > This does not specify what happens when re-INVITE gets a 404 response, > since this is not something that should normally happen for the request > with the dialog. Getting 404 to a re-INVITE means something went horribly > wrong and terminating dialog by sending BYE is probably the right course of > action. > > Regards, > _____________ > Roman Shpount > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 2:23 PM Moy Amiga <moises.am...@c3ntro.com> wrote: > >> Thank you Roman. >> >> But about the RFC 5057, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5057#section-5.1 >> And I dont know if this RFC is for the NOTIFY only or also include a >> INVITE message. >> >> >> For the failure responses with code 400 and greater, there are three >> common ways the failure can affect the transaction, usage, and dialog >> state. >> >> Transaction Only The error affects only the transaction, not the >> usage or dialog the transaction occurs in (beyond affecting the >> local CSeq). Any other usage of the dialog is unaffected. The >> error is a complaint about this transaction, not the usage or >> dialog that the transaction occurs in. >> >> Destroys Usage The error destroys the usage, but not the dialog. >> Any other usages sharing this dialog are not affected. >> >> Destroys Dialog The error destroys the dialog and all usages sharing >> it. >> >> Table 1 and Table 2 display how the various codes affect transaction, >> usage, or dialog state. Response code specific comments or >> exceptions follow the table. >> >> +----------------------+----------------+-----------------+ >> | Transaction Only | Destroys Usage | Destroys Dialog | >> +----------------------+----------------+-----------------+ >> | 400 (or unknown 4xx) | 405, 480 | 404, 410, 416 | >> | 401, 402, 403, 406 | 481, 489 | 482, 483 | >> | 407, 408, 412-415 | 501 | 484, 485 | >> | 417, 420, 421, 422 | | 502, 604 | >> | 423, 428, 429 | | | >> | 436-438, 486, 487 | | | >> | 488, 491, 493, 494 | | | >> | 500 (or unknown 5xx) | | | >> | 503, 504, 505 | | | >> | 513, 580 | | | >> | 600 (or unknown 6xx) | | | >> | 603, 606 | | | >> +----------------------+----------------+-----------------+ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Moisés Amiga* >> >> *Voice Operations* >> >> *Mex T.* + 52 (55) 5147 8040 ext 1367 >> *Cel.* +521 55 2575 6848 >> Llámame <http://callmenow.c3ntro.com/c3ntro1...@c3ntro.bicentel.net> >> >> Paseo de las Palmas 215-304 >> Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, >> México D.F. 11000 >> >> >> >> >> >> El vie., 21 de dic. de 2018 a la(s) 12:52, Roman Shpount ( >> ro...@telurix.com) escribió: >> >>> Sorry, BYE message. I blame this on consistent fat-fingering. >>> >>> :) >>> _____________ >>> Roman Shpount >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:31 PM Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > BUY message? What is this, Broadsoft? :-) >>> > >>> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:29:26PM -0500, Roman Shpount wrote: >>> > >>> > > You will need to send the BUY message. 404 response only cancels the >>> > > re-INVITE transaction, not the call. This being said, most SIP >>> > > implementations will hang up the call (send BUY) when they receive >>> 404 >>> > > response to a re-INVITE. >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > _____________ >>> > > Roman Shpount >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:54 PM Moy Amiga <moises.am...@c3ntro.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi. >>> > > > >>> > > > I Have a question. >>> > > > When I have a already established call, and we send a Re-Invite, if >>> > this >>> > > > Re-Invite was rejected with 404. >>> > > > To finish the call, we need a BYE message or only with this reject >>> > 404 the >>> > > > session is considered canceled? >>> > > > >>> > > > Thank you and best regards >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > *Moisés Amiga* >>> > > > >>> > > > *Voice Operations* >>> > > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > > Sip-implementors mailing list >>> > > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>> > > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >>> > > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Sip-implementors mailing list >>> > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>> > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC >>> > >>> > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) >>> > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Sip-implementors mailing list >>> > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sip-implementors mailing list >>> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >>> >> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
