But you could argue that also A is on hold after “3. A sends 200 ok with a=inactive” ? BR/pj
Sensitivity: Internal From: Roman Shpount <ro...@telurix.com> Sent: den 7 september 2023 14:26 To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Call hold with a=inactive A should respond with a=sendrecv. The A response (offer in 2XX response to a re-INVITE) should depend on A hold status only. The state of B has no effect on A offers. So, since A is not on hold, a=sendrecv is the most appropriate answer. On the other hand, if A sends a re-INVITE without SDP to B, B should respond with a=inactive, since B is on hold. _____________ Roman Shpount On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 6:55 AM Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) <per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se<mailto:per-johan.sundb...@telenor.se>> wrote: Hi ! A question that I hope is simple for some helpful person to answer: 1. Call connected between A and B 2. B holds the call with re-INVITE a=inactive 3. A sends 200 ok with a=inactive 4. B sends re-INVITE without SDP A should answer a=sendonly or is a=sendrecv normally a better option or perhaps something else ? MVH/pj Sensitivity: Internal _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu<mailto:Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
