Volker, Can I explain why you believe that for "small" servers (supporting < 20 clients) you believe that the retry after is problematic? I don't think it's that clear from the draft.
And if so, would there be a way to mitigate the oscillation while allowing the Retry-After? I'm a little concerned about a rule that seems somewhat vague on this. > -----Original Message----- > From: Volker Hilt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:11 > To: sip > Subject: [Sip] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hilt-sip-correction-503-00.txt] > > Below is a draft that proposes a correction to the definition > of 503 (Service Unavailable) responses in RFC 3261. The goal > of this draft is to avoid some of the problems that have been > identified with 503, however, it does not attempt to provide > a full blown overload control solution. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hilt-sip-correction- 503-00.txt > > Comments, thoughts are highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Volker > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
