On May 22, 2007, at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Francois Audet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
416 is ok for "SIPS is not OK, but SIP will work".
It is NOT ok for "SIP is not OK, but SIPS will works". For that,
you can
use 302 or 301.
What I like about 380 is that it seems to be designed for situations
where the calling user should be consulted, as opposed to 301/302,
which implementations seem to take as instructions for automatic
redirection.
We've previously issued guidance on consulting users in the case of a
302. Part of the justification here is that redirecting someone who
placed a "local" call to a destination for which they would be
charged "long distance" (or any other situation producing a similar
differentiation in cost) is something that users would want to be
informed of and consent to.
Are you suggesting that all such cases might be more appropriately
dealt with by a 380? If so, how do we prevent malevolent types from
abusing 302?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
