Correct. Sorry for that. I guess the same applies to my other mail regarding the partial subtype.
The question is whether we also need to say something about message subtypes, but if we think it should be done in another document I won't argue against that. Regards, Christer > -----Original Message----- > From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30. toukokuuta 2007 12:17 > To: Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: MIME: External-body body types > > Hi Christer, > > external body is not a multipart subtype. It it a message > subtype. This draft deals with multipart subtypes. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > > > Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > One thing I think we should study a little more is the usage of > > 'external-body'. > > > > It can be used to indicate references to bodies located > elsewhere then > > in the SIP message itself, so maybe there could be some potential > > usage for it. > > > > We also have SIP headers (e.g. Alert-Info) which can be used for > > similar things, so... > > > > If we don't want to allow it, it would be good to also > explicitly add > > it to the list of body types which would require an option-tag. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
