Hi, I have a couple of comments/questions on this draft. 3.2 Policy subscription The MIME type defined in this draft for session-independent policies is application/session-policy+xml. It is mentioned that "a UA compliant to this specification MUST support the User Agent Profile Data Set for Media Policy", which (version -04) seems to define MIME type application/media-policy-dataset+xml. I guess the MIME types should be the same?
4.2 Overview, last sentence It is said that "Both types of policies [applying to the offer, or both to the offer and answer] are supported by session-specific policy mechanism." Does this require a mechanism to indicate in the policy whether the policy applies to offer, or both offer and answer? With this kind of mechanism the endpoint would not have to request a policy decision for the answer, if the policy applies only to the offer. 4.3.1 Offer in request, example on page 12 What should be the behaviour if the policy check at the end (messaages 9 and 10) indicate that the policy was unacceptable? Should there be a re-INVITE or UPDATE, possible triggering a similar policy checking again in the remote end? Would it be better to always wait for the policy decision before answering with the final response? Regards, Simo >-----Original Message----- >From: ext DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 22.05.2007 01:06 >To: IETF SIP List >Subject: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-01 > >(As WG chair) > >This is to announce a Working Group Last Call on > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-session-poli >cy-framew >ork-01.txt > >The WGLC is for 3 weeks and will end on 11th June 2007. > >Please respond to the editor, and to the SIP mailing list with >comments. > >This WGLC is being held in conjunction with the two related >documents in the SIPPING group, see mail below: > >Regards > >Keith > >--------------------------------------------------------------- >--------- >----------------------------- > >Hi all, > >This is to announce Working Group Last Call on the following documents: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-media-po >licy-data >set-04.txt (Recently updated to address the merging issue >discussed on the mailing list) >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-policy-p >ackage-03 >.txt (Unchanged since prior to IETF-68) > >This WGLC will end on 11 June 2007. > >Since the WG has previously reviewed these documents, the plan >is to keep the same set of reviewers that previously volunteered: > Bob Penfield, Shida Schubert, Flemming Andreasen, Roni >Even However, anyone additional that would like to volunteer >would be appreciated to get a fresh set of eyes on the document. > >Feedback should be sent to the authors' email addresses (which >is cc'ed using the tools alias in the above for your >convenience) and please copy the SIPPING mailing list. > >Note: the original plan was to WGLC this set of documents >along with the framework document that moved to SIP. So, stay >tuned for an announcement on the SIP list of the WGLC plans >for that document. > >Thanks, >Mary >SIPPING WG co-chair > >--------------------------------------------------------------- >--------- >------------------------------- > > >_______________________________________________ >Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >[EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip >Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
