This looks fine to me.
Paul
Dean Willis wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Session Initiation Protocol Working
Group of the IETF.
Title : Requesting Answering Modes for the Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Author(s) : D. Willis, A. Allen
Filename : draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt
Pages : 25
Date : 2007-6-12
This version is a third attempt to address the sponsoring chair's (that
would be Keith) comments as raised during the PROTO writeup prior to
sending this puppy off to the IESG. Note that this is AFTER WGLC.
Two points:
1) Thirty percent of the supporting text has been touched in the
process. If you care, you might want to eyeball the latest draft. There
should be no impacts to implementors (except, perhaps, cognitive).
2) Given the depth and breadth of the comments during PROTO writeup,
clearly, we aren't doing all that good of a job in reviewing drafts
during WGLC. The floor is open on how to do a better job. Anybody have
ideas?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
