I support this fix.
On a procedural note, its great that Robert has done the work of
building the actual patch to be made to RFC 3261. However, I'm not sure
if thats the form that the essential corrections spec will actually
take. Its actually quite hard to read in this form. Indeed my main
comment is, certainly for consideration by the working group, it would
be better to document the actual change in a summarized form rather than
the specific paragraph changes. That will help in our evaluation of it.
Perhaps the biggest change in here is that stray responses are no longer
forwarded upstream; I don't think this is emphasized enough and is
arguably a bigger problem than the request retransmit problem, which is
more of a corner case I would say.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza
Cisco Fellow Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip