On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I understand that the problem you want to solve is the following : > > > Or, when you meet someone and want get your phones paired, you > > just type the target name because you have your cell phone in your hand. > > The phones get paired. You don't need to type a long SIP URI and > > Mobile IPv6 home address. > > also mentioned in other email: > > > I'll tell it to people that I know only. I'll tell it using a user > friendly > > mechanism called "pairing" : We meet each other with our cell phones, > > and agree to exchange our contact information. > > > I guess that what you want to avoid is to input in your phone the > URI of the person you met, and instead automatically interchange URIs.
Yes and also IPv6 home address, DNS name, IPsec key, why not e-mail address, etc. In any case someone needs to enter something in their phone, either > a URI, search keyword, TEL, etc to pair a contact... Right. https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/humanresolvers Thanks, pars SE > > > > Quoting Pars Mutaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 10/12/07, Spencer Dawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > The privacy problem: normally I shouldn't be able to discover > >> your SIP URI. > >> > >> I'm guessing that if you can't tell people your SIP AOR, then SIP is > not > >> for > >> you. > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I won't publish my SIP URI in a phone book allowing anyone to see it. > > We already agreed on that. > > > > I'll tell it to people that I know only. I'll tell it using a user > friendly > > mechanism called "pairing" : We meet each other with our cell phones, > > and agree to exchange our contact information. So, the procedure is > > under our control. Pairing is good for us also because it allows us to > > exchange a secret key (note that this is already enough motivation for > > the pairing idea). > > > > The point is that, if I give you my SIP URI (using the pairing > procedure) > > then I can also give you my Mobile IPv6 home address using the same > > pairing procedure. In other words, there is _no more resolution_ from > > SIP URI to home IP address. You get them **concurrently**. > > > > We have each other's SIP URIs and home addresses. > > ->SIP application is happy, it has the target SIP URI. > > ->Routing problem is solved by mobile IPv6. > > > > My question was: do we need the SIP trapezoid in this case. > > > > Thanks, > > pars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > >> Spencer > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > >> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > >> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > >> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
