> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Stucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2007 08:48
> To: Paul Kyzivat; Hadriel Kaplan
> Cc: Elwell, John; sip; Michael Procter; Adam Roach
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > Lastly, you don't *have* to support rfc3265 at all to
> > support 3261, so the code change could be quite a bit more.
> >
> > For somebody that doesn't support 3265, and doesn't want to,
> > but that does want to support these new packages within an
> > INVITE, this is all new implementation in any case. Sure, it
> > would require supporting the NOTIFY *method*, as it is used
> > in this new usage. But the hard work is in supporting the
> > packages, not the method. And that part is the same either way.
> >
> 
> I don't agree that the method won't be hard to support. For one thing,
> many people use stock SIP stacks they got from somewhere else and have
> no idea how to add a new method or usage of a method because they've
> simply never had to do so before or simply can't due to other issues.
> Adding methods or a new nuance to an existing method may look easy on
> paper, but it can be a lot harder to do in practice. Much harder than,
> say, putting code together to toString your registration entries into
> XML for regevent.

On a similar note, I suspect that adding a header (Event?) to INFO would
be simpler than subtracting a mandatory header (Subscription-State) from
NOTIFY, purely in terms of the support for each in 3rd party stacks.

Of course, I am making a whole bunch of assumptions here that aren't
necessarily true.  So maybe this decision can be postponed until a few
more details are ironed out.

Best regards,

Michael


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to