B Venkat S.R Swamy wrote:
Hi
For an early dialogue sent after 1xx response to Invite
I'm a little confused by your terminolog. A dialog is not something you
send. It is something that exists, or not. You can have an early dialog
even if you choose not to send any messages within it.
I guess you are asking how to construct a message to be sent within an
early dialog if the 1xx response that established the early dialog did
not contain a Contact header.
and before the
2xx response, what is the expected behaviour for routing the early
dialogue if 1xx(non-100) does not
contain Contact Header.
Options:
> Route the message to the same address where initial Invite was sent.
> It is mandatory to give Contact header in 1xx if early dialogue is to
be sent.( This would require change in RFC 3261).
AFAIK it is indeed required to provide a Contact address in responses
that establish a dialog (early or not). I was thinking 3261 already
called for this, but I'll have to spend some time looking at 3261 to
confirm that.
Give an error response
to the early dialogue, if
contact is not received in 1xx(non-100).
Since the problem is with a response, you can't give an error response
to it. You will have to make do.
> Fail the dialogue/call.
The strongest thing you could do is send a CANCEL, which doesn't require
the Contact. (You can't send a BYE because that is also an in-dialog
request.)
If you received an *unreliable* provisional with a to-tag, you can just
make-do by not trying to send any messages within the dialog until you
do get a Contact, at least in the 2xx response.
If you received a *reliable* provisional without a Contact then you have
a problem because you are obligated to send a PRACK within the dialog
but you don't have the info to do so. In that case I think you must send
a CANCEL or else just pretend the response was unreliable. (Which
probably won't work well.)
I suppose you could have a UAS that sends a Contact in one response and
then fails to send it in subsequent responses. In that case you might
try to use the most recent one you have received.
Good luck,
Paul
regards
Venkat
*********************** Aricent-Restricted ***********************
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of
the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be
circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly
prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for
loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip