From: Paul Kyzivat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perhaps. I guess it depends on your assumptions about how these things are demultiplexed. If at the connection level then it is a problem. If at the message level then it isn't a problem.
My impression has always been that demultiplexing is done at the message level. It seems implicit in the RFC 3263 processes that once one has resolved the address/port that any connection (with the right protocol) to that address/port is OK. In any case, the recipient would have to see the first message before committing to service only one domain, as there isn't any other way to tell which domain a new connection is for. Which has a derivative problem when setting up TLS that the recipient doesn't know which domain it needs to provide a certificate for when the connection is established. IIRC, someone has proposed a solution where the recipient presents a certificate that specifies all of the domains it is authoritative for. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
