Just to pick up on one of the comments: Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > From: Adam Roach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Recv-Event 18x - - - o o - - >> I think you mean "1xx", not "18x" > > Yup.
Can this be extended to permit Send-Event and Recv-Event to be optional in non-2xx final responses too? The reason is simple: OPTIONS can be rejected with a 486 simply because the UA is on a call. Under those circumstances, I think it would still be useful to know what the UA supports. (There are probably other responses where it would be useful - I am simply trying to make the point, rather than list all relevant responses at this stage.) I know that a proxy consolidating responses from a forked OPTIONS might seem to make this less useful, but an OPTIONS sent to a gruu wouldn't suffer from this problem, and so would remain useful. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
