True. There are other solution approaches that have a different ownership criteria. draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc, for example, performs a return routability test.
Dan Wing wrote: > > > Richard Shockey wrote: > > >> If there is going to be a solution to the SIP identity >> problem involving e164 numbers, it will not IMHO be >> solved in the IETF. >> > > Please do not assume that the only path to E.164 enlightenment is > ENUM. > > I have one proposal on the table, draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc, which > does not use ENUM. My proposal may not be perfect, but it does > not use ENUM. > > -d > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
