I concur. Janet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/28/2008 08:49:36 PM: > James, > > I fully support your proposal. > > Cheers, > > Martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > James M. Polk > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:47 PM > To: Dean Willis; IETF SIP List > Cc: Cullen Jennings > Subject: Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet > > At 03:39 PM 2/28/2008, Dean Willis wrote: > > >Keith and I just spent the past three hours revising the agenda for > >SIP at IETF 71. > > > >It's very full, and we are not going to have time to discuss > >everything we need to discuss -- we have only 2.5 hours this time. > > > >Please take a look at: > > > >http://www.softarmor.com/mediawiki/index.php/SIP_Agenda_IETF_71 > > I thought (and hoped) Resource-Priority in Responses > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-sip-rph-in-responses-01.t > xt > was within the charter (but without a specific milestone) that we can > make a WG item and WGLC about the same day? > > Keith (putting him on the spot) mentioned this in Chicago. Vancouver > muddied the water with the introduction of "use-case#2" - which has > now been explicitly removed from consideration by this version. > > What do the WG (and chairs) think about this? > > >-- > >Dean > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
