> Forgot to post this last week. The resiprocate (open source) > sip stack has supported RFC 4474 for several years now and > has been deployed in a number of commercial products > including user agents, proxies and b2buas.
Excellent. Is there information regarding its success with E.164 numbers, SBCs, and user's understanding of an E.164 with a domain name stuck after it? Do those UAs, which support RFC4474, display the domain name? -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
