At 12:53 PM -0500 3/27/08, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: >The WG consensus so far has been that handling legacy certificates >is very important. If we (i.e., the author team) get guidance >from the ADs and SecDir that this can be relaxed, then we can do >as you suggest.
If the WG wants to handle legacy certs, you certainly need to say how and hope for the best. Assume that interoperability will be less than full. For example, you haven't covered certificates that use the DomainComponent method of expressing domain names; not that you want to go there if you don't have to... --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
