> -----Original Message----- > From: Elwell, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I too think the straw man from Dan is an interesting idea. The > alternative that I think Hadriel is suggesting (email style as a > parameter of the E.164-based SIP URI) would probably not survive any > changes of the E.164-based URI by intermediaries -part of the problem > with E.164-based URIs in practice.
I don't disagree with that, obviously, but 4474 breaks in such a case anyway. In other words, I thought he was proposing both the e164 and email-style get signed, but maybe I misunderstood. Regardless, I (maybe naively) hope the changing of From-URI E.164's is a temporary situation, for anyone except those doing end-end relationship-hiding, for whom none of this will apply anyway. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
